Subject	speed limiter is 121mph on stock ECU... tried it.. :)
Posted by	takirb on January 20, 2004 at 1:18 PM
	This message has been viewed 83 times.
In Reply To	I thought NA's did not have a limiter. (n/m) posted by JC_NS on January 20, 2004 at 01:06 PM
Message	i thought that maybe the wing on my Z was holding it back or something cause i was no where near high RPM in 5th, then i found the info on here about the speed limiter... i've since got the Ashspec ECU but i don't wanna chance breaking something by top speed....
Follow Ups	anyone know top speed for a n/a with ashspec ecu? (n/m) - joez3292 12:52:12 01/20/04 depends on your mods and I doubt you will redline it in - JC_NS 12:55:48 01/20/04 Once you put in any aftermarket ECU that removes the - YugoBernie (NoVA) 12:55:53 01/20/04 I thought NA's did not have a limiter. (n/m) - JC_NS 13:06:00 01/20/04 speed limiter is 121mph on stock ECU... tried it.. :) - takirb 13:18:12 01/20/04 wrong (n/m) - Snoguitar 14:28:19 01/20/04 well, that's what i found researching it. as soon as it'd - takirb 14:33:38 01/20/04 120 is about the rev-limiter in 4th gear >> - my91z 14:36:38 01/20/04 it is possible, but not likely. the on/off bouncing was what - takirb 14:45:24 01/20/04 researching? In the six years that I've been here... - Snoguitar 14:39:41 01/20/04 ok, i stand corrected. the stock ECU allows a higher top - takirb 14:50:26 01/20/04 No enough power to overcome drag (n/m) - Snoguitar 14:53:18 01/20/04 so the drag from my wing overpowers a stock NA's power - takirb 14:56:56 01/20/04 Probably a combination of the wing and a weak engine... - Snoguitar 15:07:19 01/20/04 good searching lol but nah, that was the speed sensor - takirb 15:14:28 01/20/04 negative...its not the wing - cant_z_me(retired) 17:09:54 01/20/04 Never said it was unstable. (n/m) - Snoguitar 17:43:54 01/20/04 it wasn't unstable at all. scary at 430am on a back road - takirb 22:34:55 01/20/04 Nope, something wrong with your car. >> - my91z 14:31:18 01/20/04 Speed limiter value. - DVDBURN (MD) 19:47:49 01/20/04 N/A cant reach top speed in under 2 minutes so its pointless (n/m) - Stealth021 12:56:01 01/20/04 sounds like a scienctificalllaayallally test was ran? - genic 13:00:17 01/20/04 why so?? (n/m) - takirb 13:18:36 01/20/04 1/4 in 15sec @ 94mph ( 149mph - 94 = 55 )( 120sec-15 = 105 ) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 13:37:05 01/20/04 you don't have a z. (n/m) - JuicycJ4(doesntlikealbinodirt) 09:41:28 01/21/04 ECU no longer has speed limiter that would affect it. - Kenny 12:56:22 01/20/04 Last night coming back from houston I hit 147 in my n/a - HelloStirFry77 12:58:03 01/20/04 sweet (n/m) - joez3292 12:59:23 01/20/04 *stupid (n/m) - Kenny 13:21:34 01/20/04 **Darwinesque (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 14:37:57 01/20/04 a word? (n/m) - HelloStirFry77 23:54:16 01/20/04 neutral on a slight slope downhill?? (n/m) - takirb 14:06:24 01/20/04 Ok, this place is being taken over by ASH,, lol - ZBlacktt 13:07:40 01/20/04 "coz rocks"...... better?? :P lol (n/m) - takirb 13:19:59 01/20/04 sheep (n/m) - genic 13:21:48 01/20/04 No doubt - SeedyROM (ZCON 2K4!) 15:30:23 01/20/04 Yeah, brings up the whole quality vs. quantity question :/ (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 15:38:05 01/20/04 Ash may know, but that's a stretch. :) (n/m) - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 13:55:31 01/20/04 The limiter is set to 315MPH. If you get going that fast, - AshsZ 14:17:48 01/20/04 Do the math-Its a physics eq. coef frict.=0.31, etc, etc,etc (n/m) - KLRBIRD 14:28:25 01/20/04 Sorry- coefficient of Drag I'll see if i can post it tonight (n/m) - KLRBIRD 14:34:16 01/20/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.